Great questions! Let me walk through our complete implementation approach covering CI/CD pipeline structure, automated testing strategy, and multi-region deployment handling.
CI/CD Pipeline Architecture:
Our pipeline is structured in five stages: Build, Test, Deploy-Canary, Deploy-Production, and Monitor. The Build stage validates all configuration files and parameter sets. We use Git as our source of truth with separate branches for development, staging, and production configurations.
The key to managing multiple regions is our parameterization strategy. We maintain a base replenishment configuration template that defines the core logic - reorder algorithms, demand forecasting methods, and supplier integration rules. Each region has a parameters file in JSON format:
Region-NA-East.json contains:
- minStockLevels per product category
- maxStockLevels per product category
- reorderPoints
- supplierLeadTimes
- safetyStockMultipliers
During the Build stage, our pipeline script merges base configuration with regional parameters to generate deployment-ready configurations for each distribution center. This ensures consistency in logic while respecting regional differences.
Automated Testing Framework:
Our testing approach has three layers that James and Steven asked about:
-
Schema Validation: PowerShell scripts validate JSON structure, data types, and required fields. This catches basic configuration errors immediately.
-
Business Rule Validation: Custom validation scripts check business logic constraints. For example, verifying that maxStockLevel is always greater than minStockLevel, reorder points fall between min and max, and safety stock multipliers are within acceptable ranges (0.5 to 3.0 in our case). We also validate that supplier lead times align with our procurement system data.
-
Simulation Testing: This is the most sophisticated layer. We extract the last 90 days of actual demand data, supplier performance, and inventory movements from each region. The pipeline runs the new replenishment configuration against this historical data to simulate what would have happened. We measure:
- Stockout incidents (days when demand exceeded available inventory)
- Excess inventory (days when stock exceeded max levels by >20%)
- Order frequency changes (comparing to actual order patterns)
- Total inventory carrying costs
If simulation results show more than 5% increase in stockouts or more than 15% increase in excess inventory compared to actual historical performance, the deployment fails and requires manual review. This simulation stage has been invaluable - it caught a configuration error in our first deployment that would have caused stockouts for three high-volume product categories.
Multi-Region Deployment Strategy:
To address Priya’s rollback concerns and James’s phased rollout question, we implemented a canary deployment pattern with automated rollback capabilities.
Deployment sequence:
- Canary Region (NA-Central - our smallest DC): Deploy to one distribution center first. Monitor for 24 hours.
- Production Rollout: If canary metrics are acceptable, deploy to remaining four regions in sequence with 4-hour gaps between each.
- Full Monitoring: Track key metrics for 72 hours post-deployment.
For rollback handling, we can’t do immediate automated rollback like you would with a web application because inventory decisions have already been made based on the new rules. Instead, we implemented a “configuration snapshot” approach:
- Before each deployment, the pipeline creates a snapshot of current configuration and recent replenishment decisions
- Post-deployment monitoring tracks real-time metrics: order frequency, stock levels, pending orders
- If metrics deviate beyond thresholds (stockouts increase >10% or excess inventory >25%), the system triggers an alert but doesn’t auto-rollback
- Operations team reviews the alert with the configuration snapshot and can make an informed decision
- If rollback is needed, we deploy the previous configuration snapshot, but we also manually review pending orders that were placed under the new rules
This approach acknowledges that inventory decisions aren’t instantly reversible. The 24-hour canary period and 4-hour gaps between regional deployments give us time to catch issues before they propagate everywhere.
Monitoring and Continuous Improvement:
Post-deployment monitoring is integrated into our Azure DevOps pipeline. We pull key metrics from Epicor SCM every 4 hours:
- Current stock levels vs. min/max thresholds
- Open purchase orders by region
- Stockout incidents
- Inventory turnover rates
These metrics feed into a dashboard that compares pre-deployment vs. post-deployment performance. After 30 days, we run an automated analysis that measures:
- Stockout reduction percentage
- Inventory carrying cost changes
- Order frequency optimization
- Forecast accuracy improvement
Results and Benefits:
Since implementing this CI/CD approach three months ago:
- Deployment time reduced from 2-3 days to 90 minutes average
- Configuration errors reduced by 95% (only one minor issue in 12 deployments)
- Stockouts decreased by 23% across all regions
- We can now deploy replenishment logic updates weekly instead of quarterly
- Regional supply chain teams spend 60% less time on manual configuration
The parameterization approach for multi-region deployment has been particularly successful. Each region maintains its unique characteristics while benefiting from centralized logic improvements. When we optimize the core replenishment algorithm, all regions get the benefit automatically on the next deployment.
The key lesson learned: invest heavily in simulation testing upfront. Our initial pipeline didn’t include the simulation layer, and we had issues in our first production deployment. Adding comprehensive simulation testing was worth the extra development time - it’s caught every significant issue since then before reaching production.