Custom test automation metrics dashboards vs default widgets - which approach scales better?

ALM Azure DevOps
, , , , , , , ,
1

We’re evaluating whether to build custom dashboards using Analytics OData queries and Power BI, or stick with Azure DevOps default test automation widgets. Our organization has 15 projects with varying test automation maturity levels, and we need consistent reporting across all teams.

Default widgets are easier to set up but feel limited for cross-project analysis. Custom dashboards offer more flexibility but require maintenance. For teams that have implemented either approach at scale, what’s been your experience? Specifically interested in how Analytics OData queries perform with large test result datasets and whether Power BI integration adds significant value over built-in dashboard capabilities.

2

We went the custom dashboard route using Analytics OData queries and haven’t looked back. The default widgets are fine for single-project views, but they don’t handle cross-project aggregation well. With OData queries, we built dashboards that pull test metrics from all 20 projects into unified views. The query performance is solid even with millions of test results, though you need to be careful with filter optimization.

3

Having implemented both approaches across multiple organizations, I can provide a comprehensive comparison based on real-world experience at scale.

Default Widgets - Strengths:

  1. Zero Maintenance: Auto-updates with Azure DevOps platform changes, no schema dependency management
  2. Quick Setup: Teams can create dashboards in minutes using built-in widgets
  3. Native Integration: Seamless access control, respects Azure DevOps permissions
  4. Dashboard Templates: Can export/import dashboard configurations across projects for standardization
  5. Real-time Data: Widgets query live data without refresh delays

Default Widgets - Limitations:

  1. Cross-Project Views: Limited ability to aggregate metrics across multiple projects in a single widget
  2. Custom Metrics: Can’t create calculated fields or custom KPIs beyond what’s provided
  3. Historical Trends: Limited to predefined time ranges and aggregation periods
  4. Advanced Analytics: No correlation analysis, predictive metrics, or statistical modeling
  5. Export Capabilities: Limited data export options for further analysis

Custom Dashboards (Analytics OData + Power BI) - Strengths:

  1. Cross-Project Views: Unlimited ability to aggregate and compare metrics across all projects
  2. Custom Metrics: Create any calculated field, KPI, or derived metric
  3. Advanced Analytics: Correlation analysis, trend forecasting, statistical process control
  4. Flexible Visualization: Power BI offers far more chart types and customization
  5. Data Integration: Combine Azure DevOps test metrics with external data sources
  6. Executive Reporting: Sophisticated reports with drill-down capabilities

Custom Dashboards - Limitations:

  1. Maintenance Overhead: 2-4 hours per quarter for schema updates
  2. Initial Development: 40-80 hours to build comprehensive dashboard suite
  3. Query Performance: OData queries need optimization for large datasets (>5M test results)
  4. Refresh Latency: Power BI datasets refresh on schedule, not real-time
  5. Licensing Costs: Power BI Pro licenses required for sharing dashboards
  6. Technical Skills: Requires DAX, M Query, and OData expertise

Analytics OData Query Performance at Scale:

Based on testing with large datasets:

  • Under 1M test results: Sub-second query response times
  • 1M-5M test results: 2-5 second response with proper filtering
  • Over 5M test results: Requires query optimization (indexed filters, date ranges, aggregation at source)

Key optimization techniques:


// Pseudocode - Efficient OData query pattern:
1. Filter at source: $filter=CompletedDate ge 2025-01-01
2. Select only needed fields: $select=TestRunId,Outcome,Duration
3. Apply aggregations server-side: $apply=groupby((Outcome),aggregate($count as TestCount))
4. Limit result sets: $top=1000 for detailed queries
5. Use Analytics views: Pre-aggregated for common metrics

Power BI Integration Value:

Power BI adds significant value beyond built-in capabilities:

  1. Correlation Analysis: Link test automation coverage to defect rates, deployment frequency, lead time
  2. Predictive Analytics: Forecast test execution trends, identify at-risk releases
  3. Multi-Source Integration: Combine test metrics with production telemetry, customer feedback
  4. Custom Hierarchies: Create organizational views (portfolio → program → team → individual)
  5. Automated Distribution: Schedule report delivery to stakeholders

Recommendation for Your Scenario (15 Projects):

Implement a hybrid approach with clear boundaries:

Team-Level (Default Widgets):

  • Test pass rate trends
  • Test execution duration
  • Failed test breakdown
  • Test automation progress
  • Use dashboard templates to standardize across teams

Organization-Level (Custom Power BI):

  • Cross-project test automation coverage comparison
  • Defect correlation analysis
  • Test automation ROI metrics
  • Executive scorecards
  • Predictive quality metrics

Implementation Strategy:

  1. Phase 1 (Month 1): Create standardized dashboard templates with default widgets for all 15 projects
  2. Phase 2 (Month 2-3): Build core Power BI dashboards for cross-project views and executive reporting
  3. Phase 3 (Month 4): Add advanced analytics (correlation, forecasting) based on stakeholder feedback
  4. Ongoing: Maintain Power BI dashboards quarterly, update templates as needed

Scalability Assessment:

  • Default widgets scale well for team-level views (15-100+ projects)
  • Custom dashboards scale well for organization-level views (up to 50 projects in single Power BI dataset)
  • Performance remains acceptable with proper OData query optimization even at 10M+ test results

The hybrid approach gives you the best of both worlds: low-maintenance team dashboards with built-in widgets, and sophisticated cross-project analytics where custom dashboards add clear value. The key is not choosing one over the other, but using each where it provides the most benefit relative to its cost.

4

We use a hybrid approach - default widgets for team-level dashboards and custom Power BI reports for executive reporting. Teams get easy-to-maintain daily views, while leadership gets sophisticated analytics with OData queries. The Power BI integration adds tremendous value for trend analysis and predictive metrics that default widgets can’t provide. Dashboard templates help standardize the team-level views across our 12 projects.